Publication Pandemonium: An Asynchronous Online Quiz Competition for Open Access Week

Devon Olson; Sara Westall

doi:10.18060/29028

المؤلفون

Devon Olson University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1682-0199
Sara Westall University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1356-5823

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18060/29028

الكلمات المفتاحية:

open access، asynchronous، programming، competition، scholarly communications

الملخص

Open Access Week is an international event focused on issues of equity within the scholarly publishing system. At the University of North Dakota library, we see a diverse range of attitudes towards OA. To build OA support and combat misinformation, we designed an OA week quiz competition, “Publication Pandemonium”, with an asynchronous format designed to include our clinical sites. This event was an overwhelming success despite a short turnaround, with impressive turnout never before seen in our library programming.

المراجع

1. Butler LA, Matthias L, Simard MA, Mongeon P, Haustein S. The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies [Internet]. 2023 Nov 1;4(4):778–99. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00272

2. Fyfe A, Coate K, Curry S, Lawson S, Moxham N, Røstvik CM. Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. Zenodo [Internet]; 2017 May. doi:10.5281/zenodo.546100

3. Langham-Putrow A, Bakker C, Riegelman A. Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253129. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253129

4. Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P. The Oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

5. Nelson, A. Ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. Office of Science and Technology Policy [Internet]. 2022. [Accessed 2025 Jun 9]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-Access-Memo.pdf

6. Singh Chawla D. Academic publishers face antitrust lawsuit. Chemical & Engineering News [Internet]. 2024 Sep 18 [accessed 2025 Jun 9]. https://cen.acs.org/policy/publishing/Academic-publishers-face-antitrust-lawsuit/102/i29

7. FAIR Principles. Accessed 2024 October 20]. Available from: https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/

8. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ [Internet]. 2018 Feb;6:e4375. doi:10.7717/peerj.4375

9. Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C. K., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s “mirror journal” system. Quantitative Science Studies [Internet]. 2021 Dec;2(4):1123–1143. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00157

10. U.S. Copyright Office. More Information on Fair Use; [Accessed 2025 June 9]. Available from: https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html

11. US National Institutes of Health. NIH policy for data management and sharing. NOT-OD-21-013. 2020 [Accessed 2025 June 9]. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-21-013.html

12. Van Noorden, R. Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature, 2013 March;495(7442):426–429.doi:10.1038/495426a

13. Wall Kimmerer, R. (2022). Serviceberry: An economy of abundance. Emergence Magazine. October 26 2022. [Accessed2025 June 9]. https://emergencemagazine.org/essay/the-serviceberry/