Credit due: Multiple author attribution for interdisciplinary informatics research groups

Haak LL. Persistent identifiers can improve provenance and attribution and encourage sharing of research results. Inf Services & Use. 2014;34(1/2):93-96. DOI:10.3233/ISU-140736

Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2001;52(7)5:58-569.

Schoenherr JR. Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship. Frontiers Psychol. 2015;6. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00877.

Onwude JL, Staines A, Lilford RJ. Multiple author trend worst in medicine. BMJ. 1993;306(6888):1345.

Bennett DM, Taylor DM. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emerg Med Australas. 2003;15(3):263-270.

MacFarlane B. (2017). Tackling the challenges of academic co-authorship. <http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/custom/uploads/2017/09/Coauthorship-white-paper.pdf >.

Macfarlane B. The ethics of multiple authorship: power, performativity and the gift economy. Stud High Educ. 2017;42(7):1194-1210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009.

Flanagin A, Carey LA., Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, Rennie D. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA, 1998;280(3):222-224.

Smith J. Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice? BMJ. 1994;309(6967):1456.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. <http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#three >.

Cappell MS. Equal authorship for equal authors: personal experience as an equal author in twenty peer-reviewed medical publications during the last three years. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(4):363–364. DOI:10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.022.

Cooper D. Editor's response. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(4),365. DOI: http://10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.023.

Hagen NT. Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics. 2010;84:785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0129-4.

Frandsen TF, Nicolaisen J. What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines. J Informetrics. 2014;4:608–617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.010.

Kassis T. (2017). How do research faculty in the biosciences evaluate paper authorship criteria? bioRxiv, 069468. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/069468doi.

Klein JT, Falk-Krzesinski HJ. Interdisciplinary and collaborative work: Framing promotion and tenure practices and policies. Res Policy, 2017;46(6):1055-1061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.001.

Stvilia B, Hinnant CC, Wu S, Worrall A, Lee DJ, Burnett K, Burnett G, Kazmer M, Marty PF. Toward collaborator selection and determination of data ownership and publication authorship in research collaborations. Libr & Inform Sci Res. 2017;39(2):5-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.004.

Council of Scientific Editors. (2017). CSE Recommendations for group-author articles in scientific journals and bibliometric databases. <https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/cse- policies/approved-by-the-cse-board-of-directors/cse-recommendations-for-group-author-articles-in-scientific-journals-and-bibliometric-databases/>.

American Psychological Association (1985a). Authorship determination scorecard. <http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-determination-scorecard.pdf>.

American Psychological Association (1985b). Authorship tie-breaker scorecard <http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-tie-breaker-scorecard.pdf>.

Special issue on interdisciplinary research assessment. Res Eval. 2006;15(1).

National Academy of Sciences, N. A. (2009). Authorship and the allocation of credit, in On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct