Supply Chains as Conduits of Anchor Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/28690Keywords:
Leeds Beckett University, local procurement, community engagement, inclusive economic development, anchor institution, ecosystemsAbstract
This paper explains how Leeds Beckett University (LBU) has developed a supply chain “collective” to deliver on its anchor mission. The supply chain collective is made up of 300 small and medium enterprises who trade with LBU. These organizations by subscribing to anchor principles, have access to LBU’s specialist business support advice and consultancy services provided by its Business School. This partnership arrangement offers the following benefits: it supports a shift to local purchasing and carbon reduction, provides direct business support to help small local businesses grow, and creates enriched service-learning opportunities for students and researchers.
This paper briefly explains how LBU defines its role within the Leeds City Anchor Network, how it has adapted its purchasing strategy to incorporate social value considerations, how it developed part of its supply chain as a small and medium enterprise (SME) “collective”, and how the Leeds Business School has begun to build mutually beneficial relationships by using this new supply chain as a conduit for positive regional engagement.
References
Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2012). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the U.K.: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). Academic interactions with private, public and not-for-profit organisations: The known unknowns. In J. J. M. Ferreira, M. Raposo, R. Rutten, & A. Varga (Eds.), Cooperation, clusters, and knowledge transfer: Universities and firms towards regional competitiveness (pp. 181–206). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33194-7_10
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1994). Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aranguren, J. M., & Magro, E. (2020). How can universities contribute to regional competitiveness policy-making? Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 30(2), 101–117.
Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 313–321.
Birch, E., Perry, C. D., & Taylor, L. H. Jr. (2013). Universities as anchor institutions. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(3), 7–16.
Boucher, G., Conway, C., & Van Der Meer, E. (2003). Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Regional Studies, 37, 887–897.
Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.
Cantor, N., Englot, P., & Higgins, M. (2013). Making the work of anchor institutions stick: Building coalitions and collective expertise. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(3), 17–46.
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31, 233–245.
CLES. (2018). Local wealth building in Birmingham and beyond: A new economic mainstream. Manchester: Centre for Local Economic Strategies.
Comunian, R., Taylor, C., & Smith, D. N. (2014). The role of universities in the regional creative economies of the UK: Hidden protagonists and the challenge of knowledge transfer. European Planning Studies, 22(12), 2456–2476.
Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475–491.
Denison, N., Newby, L., Mackreth, P., & Slee, P. R. H. (2024). Developing an integrated anchor system: The Leeds City Inclusive Anchor Network. Metropolitan Universities, 35(3), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.18060/27705
Fischer, M. M., & Nijkamp, P. (1988). The role of small firms for regional revitalization. The Annals of Regional Science, 1, 28.
Frenette, M. (2009). Do universities benefit local youth? Evidence from the creation of new universities. Economics of Education Review, 28(3), 318–328.
Friedman, D., Perry, D., & Menendez, C. (2013). The foundational role of the universities as anchor institutions in urban development. Washington, DC, USA: Coalition of Urban Serving Institutions.
Georgescu, A., Peter, M. K., & Avasilcai, S. (2022). A business ecosystem framework for SME development through associative and non-associative business structures in the digital age. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1).
Goddard, J., Coombes, M., Kempton, L., & Vallance, P. (2014). Universities as anchor institutions in cities in a turbulent funding environment: Vulnerable institutions and vulnerable places in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 307–325.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2010). The development of an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 43–74.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2016). The transformative role of universities: Determinants, impacts, and challenges. In J. Leitão & H. Alves (Eds.), Entrepreneurial and innovative practices in public institutions. Applying quality of life research (best practices) (pp. 43–74). Cham: Springer.
Hodgson, A., & Spours, K. (2018). A social ecosystem model: Conceptualising and connecting working, living and learning in London’s New East. ELVET Research Briefing No. 3, Centre for Post-14 Education and Work, Institute of Education, University College London.
Ierapetritis, G. D. (2019). Discussing the role of universities in fostering regional entrepreneurial ecosystems. Economies, 7, 119.
Inzelt, A. (2004). The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition. Research Policy, 33, 975–995.
Josephson, J. J. (2020). Higher education and democratic public life. New Political Science, 42(2), 155–170.
Kakouris, A., Liargovas, P., & Sousa, C. (2018). Editorial. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 8, 281–285.
Kim, P. M., Lu, L. J., Xia, Y., & Gerstein, M. B. (2006). Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science, 314, 1938-1941.
Kimmel, E. C., Hull, B. R., Stephenson, O. M., Robertson, P. D., & Cowgill, H. K. (2012). Building community capacity and social infrastructure through landcare: A case study of land grant engagement. Higher Education, 64, 223–235.
León, L. R., Izsak, K., Bougas, K., & Soto, V. (2016). Regional ecosystem scoreboard, methodology report. Final report. Bruxelles: European Cluster Observatory, European Commission.
Liam O’Farrell, Sara Hassan, & Charlotte Hoole. (2022). The university as a just anchor: Universities, anchor networks and participatory research. Studies in Higher Education, 47(12), 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2072480
MacLeod, G. (1997). “Institutional thickness” and industrial governance in Lowland Scotland. Area, 29, 299–311.
Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2001). The elusive concept of localization economies – Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning, 34(3), 429–449.
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics: An introductory volume. Macmillan, Virginia University.
McCauley-Smith, C., Smith, S., Nantunda, L., & Zhu, X. (2020). The role of anchor institutions in creating value for SMEs: Insights from North East of England owner-managers. Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1861593
McInroy, N. (2018). Wealth for all: Building new local economies. Local Economy, 33(6), 678–687.
Morrison, A. K. (2022). Poetry, place, and the university as anchor institution. English Education, 56(1), 5–17.
Needham, C. (2008). Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 7(2), 221–231.
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653.
Palin, P. (2013). Supply Chain resilience: diversity + self-organization = adaptation. Homeland Security Affairs, 9, Article 14.
Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., & Ruffini, R. (2015). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 8–27.
Sheremetov, L., & Rocha-Mier, L. (2004). Collective intelligence as a framework for supply chain management. In 2004 2nd International IEEE Conference on 'Intelligent Systems'. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04EX791) (Vol. 2, pp. 417-422). Varna, Bulgaria. https://doi.org/10.1109/IS.2004.
Sternberg, R. (2012). Do EU regional policies favor regional entrepreneurship? Empirical evidence from Spain and Germany. European Planning Studies, 20, 583–608.
Swierczek, A. (2018). The inverted U-shaped relationship between the network profile and the competitive advantage of supply chains: Chasing the perfect network setting. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(4), 1379-1400. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2017-0161
Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., Örtqvist, D., & Autio, E. (2010). Quality meets structure: generalized reciprocity and firm-level advantage in strategic networks. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 597-624.
Yin, K. R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822dda9e
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 George Londorfos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
