Policy Surveillance (And Parallels to Evidence Synthesis)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/29256Keywords:
Policy Surveillance, Evidence Synthesis, Systematic, Laws, RegulationsAbstract
Description:
Policy surveillance and evidence synthesis methods, while developing out of two distinct silos of inquiry, have parallel stepwise characteristics that make them comparable as approaches.
Purposes:
The purpose of this Methods Moment is to provide an introduction to policy surveillance, which is more specifically known as “legal mapping”. The resource can be utilized to cross-sectionally or longitudinally to understand the characteristics/intricacies of statutes, administrative regulations, executive orders, and other forms of law (within or across jurisdictions) regarding various aspects of health (e.g., insurance, task force creation, education).
Approach:
This article uses the inter-methodological comparison/contrast to connect a typically unfamiliar method (policy surveillance) to a familiar method (evidence synthesis), further using the connection as a point of departure for teaching/learning specifically about policy surveillance.
References
1. Presley D, Reinstein T, Webb-Barr D, Burris S. Creating legal data for public health monitoring and evaluation: Delphi standards for policy surveillance. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2014;43(S1):27-31. doi:10.1111/jlme.12210
2. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
3. Hahn, EJ. Smokefree legislation: A review of Health and Economic Outcomes Research. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(6):S66-S67. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.013
4. Tsaras G, Owusu-Ansah A, Owusu Boateng F, Amoateng-Adjepong Y. Complications associated with sickle cell trait: A brief narrative review. Am J Med. 2009;122(6):507-12. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julio Montanez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All works in Hypothesis are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in Hypothesis. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author(s) and the Medical Library Association are acknowledged in the copy, and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes. For any other use of articles, please contact the copyright owner(s).