Effects of Gabapentin and the α2δ1 Voltage Sensitive Calcium Channel Subunit in Skeletal Muscle

Authors

  • Alexander Buttars Indiana University School of Medicine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-9353
  • Jung Min Hong Department of Physical Therapy, Indiana University School of Health and Human Sciences
  • Meloney Cregor Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine
  • Elicza Day School of Osteopathic Medicine, Marian University
  • Julia M. Hum School of Osteopathic Medicine, Marian University; Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University
  • Joshua R. Huot Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine; Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University
  • William R. Thompson Department of Physical Therapy, Indiana University School of Health and Human Sciences; Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine; School of Osteopathic Medicine, Marian University; Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18060/29071

Abstract

Introduction: Gabapentin (GBP) is a neuropathic pain drug prescribed to millions of Americans which binds the auxiliary α2δ1 subunit of voltage sensitive calcium channels (VSCCs) to modulate calcium (Ca2+) influx. GBP functions by decreasing Ca2+ signaling in neurons; however, muscle dysfunction is commonly reported with GBP use. We hypothesized that GBP treatment, and deletion of the α2δ1 subunit, impairs skeletal muscle function by disrupting neuromuscular junction (NMJ) transmission.

Methods: Heterozygous breeder pairs for Cacna2d1, the gene encoding α2δ1, were used to generate knockout (KO) mice (male: 9 WT, 9 KO; female: 6 WT, 5 KO). The Aurora muscle contractility system determined maximum torque, rate of contraction, rate of relaxation, and fatigue of the plantarflexors. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and single motor unit potentials (SMUPs) provided motor unit number estimates (MUNEs). qPCR analyses on skeletal muscle assessed NMJ homeostasis. Male C57BL/6 mice received GBP (150 mg/kg) or vehicle (saline) twice daily via oral gavage (n=8 mice/drug group). Muscle testing was conducted at 0, 2, and 4 weeks. Gene expression in muscle was analyzed by qPCR.

Results: Males deplete of α2δ1 had decreased plantarflexion torque (p<0.001), max rate of contraction (p<0.001), max rate of relaxation (p<0.01), SMUP (p<0.001), and MUNE (p<0.01). Plantarflexion torque (p<0.01), and max rate of contraction (p<0.05) were decreased in female KO mice. Hspg2 (p<0.01) and Musk (p<0.05) expression was decreased in Male α2δ1 KO mice. However, expression of these genes was not altered in female mice. GBP treatment resulted in decreased max-torque (p<0.01), rate of contraction (p<0.001), rate of relaxation (p<0.01), and SMUP (p<0.001). Hspg2 (p<0.05), Lrp4 (p<0.05), Agrin (p<0.01), and Chrne (p<0.01) expression was decreased in muscle from GBP treated mice.

Conclusion & Significance: As GBP is a widely used neuropathic pain drug, understanding the consequences of chronic use on musculoskeletal tissues is of utmost importance. My data demonstrates that GBP treatment and α2δ1 KO decreased muscle performance. These data will help clinicians consider potential side-effects when prescribing GBP.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

Issue

Section

Abstracts